Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

George Gillette v. David M. Heritage, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia

George Gillette v. David M. Heritage, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Ga., 313 F.2d 632 (5th Cir. 1963)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1963-03-01
Topic
bankruptcy

PER CURIAM. It appearing that this habeas corpus case was decided by the trial court on the authority of Johnson v. Wilkinson, 5 Cir.,. 279 F.2d 683, we conclude that it was not error for the court to decide the case-without hearing. The judgment of the district court was correct. It is, therefore, Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed George Gillette v. David M. Heritage, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
GILLETTE v. HERITAGE,313 F.2d 632(5th Cir. 1963)
George GILLETTE, Appellant, v. David M. HERITAGE, Warden, United States
Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Appellee.
No. 19921.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 1, 1963.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; Frank A. Hooper, Chief Judge.
Joseph Lefkoff, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

Charles L. Goodson, U.S. Atty., Burton Brown, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and POPEfn*and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
It appearing that this habeas corpus case was decided by the trial court on the authority of Johnson v. Wilkinson, 5 Cir.,279 F.2d 683, we conclude that it was not error for the court to decide the case without hearing.

The judgment of the district court was correct. It is, therefore,

Affirmed.Page 636
  1. Of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. ↩