Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Dreyer v. Jalet

479 F.2d 1044

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1973-07-09
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: After consideration of the brief, trial record and reported memorandum opinion of the District Judge, D.C., 349 F. Supp. 452, we conclude that the district court should be Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dreyer v. Jalet. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 10 opinions

DREYER, v. JALET,479 F.2d 1044(5th Cir. 1973)

FREDDIE H. DREYER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. FRANCES T. FREEMAN JALET,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ROBERT SLAYMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. FRANCES T.

FREEMAN JALET, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, DONALD ALLEN LOCK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

v. FRANCES T. FREEMAN JALET, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

No. 73-1010.

Summary Calendar.^fn*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 9, 1973.

Stuart M. Nelkin, W. W. Kilgarlin, Frederick S. Grossberg, David H. Berg, Henry M. Rosenblum, Houston, Tex., William K. Kimble, Austin, Tex., Leon S. Hirsch, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Max H. Jennings, Houston, Tex., for Dreyer.

Thomas M. Phillips, Houston, Tex., for Slayman.

Donald K. Eckhardt, Houston, Tex., for Lock.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Carl O. Bue, Jr., Judge.

Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] After consideration of the brief, trial record and reported memorandum opinion of the District Judge, D.C.,349 F. Supp. 452, we conclude that the district court should be

[2] Affirmed.

Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970,431 F.2d 409, Part I. ↩