Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Dolores M. OUBRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Dolores M. OUBRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee, 112 F.3d 787 (5th Cir. 1996)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1996-11-06
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM: Dolores M. Oubre appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of her employer, Entergy Operations, Inc., in her age discrimination action. *788 We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for the reasons enunciated by the district court.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dolores M. OUBRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

OUBRE v. ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.,112 F.3d 787(5th Cir. 1996)

DOLORES M. OUBRE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.,

DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

No. 96-30654.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

November 6, 1996.

Barbara Gale Haynie, Metairie, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

James Martin McGrew, New Orleans, LA, Renee Williams Masinter, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Ginger Berrigan, Judge.

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] Dolores M. Oubre appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of her employer, Entergy Operations, Inc., in her age discrimination action.Page 788

[2] We have reviewed the record and the parties' briefs and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for the reasons enunciated by the district court.