Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Clair Evers v. Bass Powell

Clair Evers v. Bass Powell, 342 F.2d 46 (5th Cir. 1965)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1965-03-12
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: We have carefully considered the grounds for appeal asserted by the appellant, but we have no doubt of the correctness of the judgment of the trial court determining that the complaint in this case was barred by the Texas statute of limitations. The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the trial court, D.C., 238 F.Supp. 787.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Clair Evers v. Bass Powell. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
EVERS v. POWELL,342 F.2d 46(5th Cir. 1965)
Clair EVERS, Appellant, v. Bass POWELL, Appellee.
No. 21849.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 12, 1965.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Joe M. Ingraham, Judge.
Howard S. Hoover, Houston, Tex., Murfee Hoover, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellant.

Walter E. Workman, Houston, Tex., Baker, Botts, Shepherd Coates, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and BROWN and FRIENDLY,fn*Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We have carefully considered the grounds for appeal asserted by the appellant, but we have no doubt of the correctness of the judgment of the trial court determining that the complaint in this case was barred by the Texas statute of limitations. The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the trial court, D.C.,238 F. Supp. 787.Page 47
  1. Of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation. ↩