Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Childress v. Continental Casualty Co.

Childress v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 587 F.2d 809 (5th Cir. 1979)

PER CURIAM: The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the district court, 461 F.Supp. 704.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Childress v. Continental Casualty Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CHILDRESS v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY,587 F.2d 809(5th Cir. 1979)

PATRICIA F. CHILDRESS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, COMBINED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA ET AL.,

DEFENDANTS.

No. 78-1578.

Summary Calendar.^fn*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

January 9, 1979.

Francis G. Weller, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellant.

Dan C. Garner Garner Associates, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easter District of Louisiana; Edward J. Boyle, Sr., Judge.

Before CLARK, RONEY and GEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the district court,461 F. Supp. 704.

Rule 18, 5 Cir.;see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. CitizensCasualty Co. of New York et al.,5 Cir., 1970,431 F.2d 409, part I. ↩