Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Chambliss v. Foote

562 F.2d 1015

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1977-11-10
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: We affirm on the basis of the district court’s opinion, Chambliss v. Foote, 421 F.Supp. 12 (E.D.La.1976). The motion to supplement the record is denied.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Chambliss v. Foote. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
21 opinions
CHAMBLISS v. FOOTE,562 F.2d 1015(5th Cir. 1977)
JOSEPHINE J. CHAMBLISS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY
SITUATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. J. R. FOOTE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CHAIRMAN
OF MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT, UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.
No. 76-3628.
Summary Calendar.fn*
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 10, 1977.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 9, 1978.
Alvin O. Chambliss, Oxford, Miss., Hilliard Fazande, II, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

Rutledge C. Clement, Jr., Harry A. Rosenberg, Bradley N. Gater, New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Before AINSWORTH, MORGAN and GEE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[1] We affirm on the basis of the district court's opinion,Chambliss v. Foote,421 F. Supp. 12(E.D.La. 1976). The motion to supplement the record is denied.Page 565
  1. Rule 18, 5 Cir.,Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. CitizensCasualty Company of New York, et al.,5 Cir., 1970,431 F.2d 409, Part I. ↩