Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Castellano v. Fragozo
321 F.3d 1203
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2003-02-05
- Topic
- general
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Castellano v. Fragozo. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Nathan Mark Ralls (argued), Chaves, Gonzales Hoblit, San Antonio, TX, Audrey Mullert Vicknair, Chaves, Gonzales Hoblit, Corpus Christi, TX, for Fragozo.
Steven Norbert Harkiewicz (argued), Law Office of Steven N. Harkiewicz, San Antonio, TX, for Sanchez.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion Nov. 20, 2002, 5 Cir., 2002,311 F.3d 689)
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.Page 507