Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Buckner v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

476 F.2d 1287

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1973-05-17
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: We affirm the judgment of the district court and adopt its carefully considered and well-written opinion, 339 F.Supp. 1108. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Buckner v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 10 opinions

BUCKNER v. GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY,476 F.2d 1287(5th Cir. 1973)

DAVID BUCKNER ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER

COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

No. 72-2697.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 17, 1973.

David H. Hood, Jr., Bessemer, Ala., Nathaniel Jones, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.

William F. Gardner, Birmingham, Ala., Clarence F. Rhea, Gadsden, Ala., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; Sam C. Pointer, Jr., Judge.

Before BELL, DYER and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] We affirm the judgment of the district court and adopt its carefully considered and well-written opinion,339 F. Supp. 1108.

[2] Affirmed.