Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Brown v. Georgia Power Co.

491 F.2d 117

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1974-03-14
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the well-reasoned opinion below. Brown v. Georgia Power Co., 371 F.Supp. 543 (S.D.Ga. 1973). The proper forum for plaintiff’s troubling complaints of denial of procedural due process in the state trial court is the appellate courts of Georgia. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Brown v. Georgia Power Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 4 opinions

BROWN v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY,491 F.2d 117(5th Cir. 1974)

S. K. BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY ET AL.,

DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

No. 73-3569.

Summary Calendar.^fn*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 14, 1974.

Percy J. Blount, Augusta, Ga., J. Nat Hamrick, Rutherfordton, N.C., for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert C. Norman, Augusta, Ga., Michael C. Murphy, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia.

Before WISDOM, GOLDBERG and GEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the well-reasoned opinion below. Brown v. Georgia Power Co.,371 F. Supp. 543(S.D.Ga. 1973). The proper forum for plaintiff's troubling complaints of denial of procedural due process in the state trial court is the appellate courts of Georgia.

[2] Affirmed.

Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970,431 F.2d 409, Part I. ↩