Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Anderson v. Pennington

28 F.2d 1007

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1928-10-23
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. For the reasons stated by the District Judge in his opinion in this ease, published in Anderson v. Anderson, 23 F.(2d) 331, the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Anderson v. Pennington. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
ANDERSON v. PENNINGTON,28 F.2d 1007(5th Cir. 1928)
Edgar Freeman ANDERSON, as Receiver of the First National Bank of
Covington, Georgia, Appellant, v. William Bell Raiford PENNINGTON et al.,
Appellees.fn*
No. 5317.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
October 23, 1928.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia; Samuel H. Sibley, Judge.
Victor L. Smith, of Atlanta, Ga. (R.M. Tuck, of Covington, Ga., and Smith, Hammond Smith, of Atlanta, Ga., on the brief), for appellant.

Marion Smith, of Atlanta, Ga., and Lamar C. Rucker, of Athens, Ga. (Little, Powell, Smith Goldstein, of Atlanta, Ga., and A.S. Thurman, of Monticello, Ga., on the brief), for appellees.
Before WALKER and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated by the District Judge in his opinion in this case, published in Anderson v. Anderson,23 F.2d 331, the decree appealed from is affirmed.Page 1010
  1. Rehearing denied December 19, 1928. ↩