Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

American United Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Avon Park

Am. United Mut. Life Ins. v. City of Avon Park, 108 F.2d 1010 (5th Cir. 1940)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1940-01-31
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. There being no substantial distinction between this case and that presented in Vallette v. City of Vero Beach, 5 Cir., 104 F.2d 59, the order appealed from is affirmed, upon the authority of that case. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed American United Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Avon Park. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 1 opinion

AMERICAN UN. M. L. INS. v. CITY OF AVON PARK,108 F.2d 1010(5th Cir. 1940)

AMERICAN UNITED MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Creditors,

Appellants, v. CITY OF AVON PARK, FLORIDA, Debtor, Appellee.

No. 9294.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

January 31, 1940.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida; Alexander Akerman, Judge.

Giles J. Patterson, of Jacksonville, Fla., Harry L. Thompson and Edgar John Phillips, both of Clearwater, Fla., for appellants.

Robert J. Pleus, of Orlando, Fla., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

There being no substantial distinction between this case and that presented in Vallette v. City of Vero Beach, 5 Cir.,104 F.2d 59, the order appealed from is affirmed, upon the authority of that case.

Affirmed.Page 1