Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Amer Gooseneck Inc v. Watts Trucking Svc

159 F.3d 1355

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1998-09-16
Topic
general

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________ No. 97-50969 Summary Calendar _______________ AMERICAN GOOSENECK, INC., d/b/a AG PRODUCTS, Plaintiff-Appellant- Cross-Appellee, VERSUS WATTS TRUCKING SERVICE, INC., and MEL KEMP, Defendants-Appellees- Cross-Appellants. _________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (SA-96-CV-181) _________________________ September 16, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:* American Gooseneck, Inc., doing business as AG Products (“Gooseneck”), sued Watts Trucking Services, Inc. (“Watts Trucking”), and Mel Kemp for conversion. Gooseneck claimed that Watts Trucking and Kemp had purchased front load containers, or * Pursuant to 5TH CIR.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Amer Gooseneck Inc v. Watts Trucking Svc. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions

159 F.3d 1355

Amer Gooseneck
v.
Watts Trucking*

NO. 97-50969

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

September 16, 1998

Appeal From: W.D.Tex. , No. SA-96-CV-181

1

Reversed.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34-2