Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Alex A. Popeko v. United States

Alex A. Popeko v. United States, 309 F.2d 752 (5th Cir. 1962)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1962-11-28
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the trial court denying the motion of appellant to correct his sentence under Rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, is based on the previous affirmance by this Court, Popeko v. United States, 5th Cir., 294 F.2d 168, of the conviction and sentence. The order of the trial court is therefore Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Alex A. Popeko v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
POPEKO v. UNITED STATES,309 F.2d 752(5th Cir. 1962)
Alex A. POPEKO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 19915.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 28, 1962.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Ben H. Rice, Jr., District Judge.
Alex Popeko, appellant, in pro. per.

Andrew L. Jefferson, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., K. Key Hoffman, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Ernest Morgan, U.S. Atty., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the trial court denying the motion of appellant to correct his sentence under Rule35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, is based on the previous affirmance by this Court, Popeko v. United States, 5th Cir.,294 F.2d 168, of the conviction and sentence.

The order of the trial court is therefore

Affirmed.