Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Walker v. Monsanto Chemical Co.

Walker v. Monsanto Chem. Co., 354 F.2d 240 (4th Cir. 1965)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1965-12-16
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM: Upon consideration of the record, the briefs of the parties filed herein and the oral arguments of counsel presented at the bar of the court, we find no substantial error commanding reversal. Therefore the judgment below will be affirmed. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Walker v. Monsanto Chemical Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

WALKER v. MONSANTO CHEMICAL COMPANY,354 F.2d 240(4th Cir. 1965)

Orville W. WALKER, Appellant, v. MONSANTO CHEMICAL COMPANY, a corporation,

Appellee.

No. 10077.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued December 9, 1965.

Decided December 16, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston; John A. Field, Jr., Judge.

Richard M. Markus, Cleveland, Ohio (Sindell, Sindell, Bourne, Markus, Stern Spero, Cleveland, Ohio, and Kaufman Browning, Charleston, W. Va., on brief), for appellant.

Robert L. Elkins, Charleston, W. Va., (W.T. O'Farrell, John R. Lukens, and Jackson, Kelly, Holt O'Farrell, Charleston, W. Va., on brief), for appellee.

Before BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and MAXWELL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the record, the briefs of the parties filed herein and the oral arguments of counsel presented at the bar of the court, we find no substantial error commanding reversal. Therefore the judgment below will be affirmed.

Affirmed.Page 410