Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. William Michael Austrew

317 F.2d 926

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1963-06-10
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

in criminal case, birth certificate was admissible even though first and middle names were transposed; the weight to be given it was enhanced by the victim’s testimony as to its contents

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. William Michael Austrew. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

UNITED STATES v. AUSTREW,317 F.2d 926(4th Cir. 1963)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. William Michael AUSTREW, Appellant.

No. 8621.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 4, 1963.

Decided June 10, 1963.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, District Judge.

Norman N. Yankellow, Baltimore, Md. (Court-assigned counsel), for appellant.

Daniel F. McMullen, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (Joseph D. Tydings, U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, BRYAN, Circuit Judge, and LEWIS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Notwithstanding the earnest and skillful efforts of the appellant's court-appointed counsel, we find no error in the decision of the District Court and affirm upon its opinion202 F. Supp. 816(D.Md. 1962).

Affirmed.Page 7