Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
United States v. Wayland White, Jr.
United States v. Wayland White, Jr., 344 F.2d 92 (4th Cir. 1965)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1965-04-05
- Topic
- general
*93 PER CURIAM: Wayland White, Jr. was convicted of conspiracy to violate Internal Revenue laws pertaining to distilled spirits. He was first tried in April 1961. The trial court set aside the judgment and ordered a new trial. White was again tried and convicted in September 1961. The judgment was affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Wayland White, Jr.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
UNITED STATES v. WHITE,344 F.2d 92(4th Cir. 1965)
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Wayland WHITE, Jr., Appellant.
No. 9698.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued March 1, 1965.
Decided April 5, 1965.
William H. Murdock, U.S. Atty. (H. Marshall Simpson, Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief) for appellee.
Before SOBELOFF and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, District Judge.Page 93
We find no merit in White's assertion that the trial court failed to comply with18 U.S.C. § 3500(Jencks act) The Government produced for inspection the statement made by its witness. No other notes or memorandum made by the witness were available to the United States Attorney. Inquiry made by him to the witness' supervisors at the direction of the District Court proved fruitless.
The record of the September 1961 trial showed that the notes used by the witness in preparing his statement were delivered to White's attorney who used them for cross-examination. White was furnished the transcript of the previous trial in which his attorney used the notes. No intention to suppress evidence was shown. Under these circumstances the Court was not required to strike the witness' testimony or grant a mistrial. Cf. Killian v. United States,368 U.S. 231,82 S.Ct. 302,7 L.Ed.2d 256(1961); United States v. Greco,298 F.2d 247(2nd Cir. 1962); cert. denied369 U.S. 820,82 S.Ct. 831,7 L.Ed.2d 785(1962).
At the Court's direction the Government furnished White the address of a paid informer. We find no error in the Court's refusal to require the Government to produce and offer the informer as a witness. The evidence does not disclose that the defendant was entrapped or that the informer participated in any undertaking to entrap the defendant. The basis is lacking for the application of the principles expressed in United States v. Ramsey,220 F. Supp. 86(E.D.Tenn. 1963), upon which the defendant relies.
White sought the appointment of counsel to represent him. The District Judge after hearing testimony found that White had adequate resources to provide his own counsel. White then sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal to this Court from the refusal of the District Judge to appoint counsel for him. Upon consideration of his petition and the Memorandum Opinion of the District Judge, this Court concluded that White has not shown himself to be a pauper or in need of the assistance of appointed counsel. White has shown no additional facts warranting a change in the conclusion previously reached by the District Court and by this Court.
The judgment is
Affirmed.