Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
United States v. James Kane
706 F. App'x 141
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2017-12-19
- Topic
- estate-planning
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6264 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES KANE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. James Kane. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:James Kane appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, filed pursuant to authorization from this court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and deny Kane’s motion to accelerate the processing of the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED