Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

177 F.2d 805

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1949-11-09
Topic
bankruptcy

PER CURIAM. These are appeals in tax cases involving the right of an insurance company to deduct from gross income the reserve set- up against unearned premiums and losses on risks reinsured with an insurance company not authorized to do business within the state. The question involved, as counsel for the government admitted at the bar of the court, is precisely the question which was before the Court of Appeals of the First Circuit in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. New Hampshire Fire Ins. Co., 1 Cir., 146 F.2d 697, in which that court affirmed the decision of the Tax Court. 2 T.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
13 opinions
UNITED STATES v. FIDELITY DEPOSIT CO.,177 F.2d 805(4th Cir. 1949)
UNITED STATES v. FIDELITY DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND. HOFFERBERT, Collector
of Internal Revenue, v. FIDELITY DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND.
Nos. 5912, 5913.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued November 8, 1949.
Decided November 9, 1949.
Edward J.P. Zimmerman, Special Assistant to the Attorney General (Theron Lamar Caudle, Assistant Attorney General; Ellis N. Slack, Robert N. Anderson and Leland T. Atherton, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, and Bernard J. Flynn, U.S. Attorney, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellants.

Frank E. Horka, Baltimore, Md. (J. Stuart Galloway, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellee.
Before PARKER, Chief Judge and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
These are appeals in tax cases involving the right of an insurance company to deduct from gross income the reserve set up against unearned premiums and losses on risks reinsured with an insurance company not authorized to do business within the state. The question involved, as counsel for the government admitted at the bar of the court, is precisely the question which was before the Court of Appeals of the First Circuit in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. New Hampshire Fire Ins. Co., 1 Cir.,146 F.2d 697, in which that court affirmed the decision of the Tax Court.2 T.C. 708. We are in accord with the decision of the First Circuit, and nothing need be added to its opinion. We note, however, that the Tax Court has adhered to its original decision, affirmed by the First Circuit, in three subsequent cases. National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Com'r,5 T.C.M. 927; Columbia Casualty Co. v. Com'r,7 T.C.M. 282; United States Guarantee Co. v. Com'r,8 T.C.M. 510. And for a decision to the effect that a reserve required to be set up by state law and withdrawn from use by the company may properly be deducted in computation of gross income, see our decision in Early v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corporation, 4 Cir.,132 F.2d 42.
Affirmed.Page 806
Page 808