Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Boone

United States v. Boone, 499 F.2d 551 (4th Cir. 1974)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1974-07-16
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: The issues presented by these appeals were specifically resolved adversely to the Defendants! position by the Supreme Court in United States v. Giordano et al., 416 U.S. 505, 94 S.Ct. 1820, 40 L.Ed.2d 341 (1974) and United States v. Chavez et al., 416 U.S. 562, 94 S.Ct. 1849, 40 L.Ed.2d 380 (1974). The orders of the district court 348 F.Supp. 168 granting the Defendants’ motions to suppress are, therefore, reversed and the cases are remanded for further proceedings. Reversed and remanded.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Boone. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
UNITED STATES v. BOONE,499 F.2d 551(4th Cir. 1974)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT v. HORACE W. BOONE ET AL., APPELLEES.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT v. EARL DICKENS ET AL., APPELLEES.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT v. DURWOOD RAY BURGESS, AKA PETE, ET
AL., APPELLEES.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT v. LEONARD FRIEDMAN, AKA 5757, AND
HORACE W. BOONE, AKA 102, APPELLEES.
Nos. 73-1080 to 73-1083.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 13, 1974.
Decided July 16, 1974.
Brian P. Gettings, U.S. Atty., David G. Lowe and Dennis H. Dohnal, Asst. U.S. Attys., on brief, for appellant.

Murray J. Janus, Edward D. Barnes, Matthew N. Ott, Jr., Richmond, Va., James W. Renney, Wakefield, Va., C. Hardaway Marks, Hopewell, Va., C. Willard Norwood, Richmond, Va., J. Claiborne Dance, Richard L. Jones, Petersburg, Va. [Court-appointed counsel], William Earle White, Jr., Andrew W. Wood, Richmond, Va. [Court-appointed counsel], James G. Harrison, Hopewell, Va. [Court-appointed counsel], Robert L. Harris, R. R. Ryder, Joseph S. Bambacus and R. Carter Scott, III, Richmond, Va., on brief, for appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond; Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Judge.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and FIELD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[1] The issues presented by these appeals were specifically resolved adversely to the Defendants' position by the Supreme Court in United States v. Giordano et al.,416 U.S. 505,94 S.Ct. 1820,40 L.Ed.2d 341(1974) and United States v. Chavez et al.,416 U.S. 562,94 S.Ct. 1849,40 L.Ed.2d 380(1974). The orders of the district court348 F. Supp. 168granting the Defendants' motions to suppress are, therefore, reversed and the cases are remanded for further proceedings.

[2] Reversed and remanded.Page 754