Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.
O'Connor v. Consol. Coin Caterers Corp., 84 F.3d 718 (4th Cir. 1996)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1996-06-05
- Topic
- litigation
BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge, dissenting: After the Supreme Court reversed and remanded this case, both parties requested leave to file supplemental briefs and to present oral argument. Their requests, I believe, are reasonable. For reasons stated in Part II of my separate opinion, see O’Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp., 56 F.3d 542, 551 (4th Cir.1995) (Butzner, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), I dissent from the disposition of this case by summary judgment. The evidence recounted in Part II of my separate opinion creates a genuine issue of material fact that should be decided by trial.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
dissenting:
After the Supreme Court reversed and remanded this case, both parties requested leave to file supplemental briefs and to present oral argument. Their requests, I believe, are reasonable. For reasons stated in Part II of my separate opinion, see O’Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp., 56 F.3d 542, 551 (4th Cir.1995) (Butzner, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), I dissent from the disposition of this case by summary judgment. The evidence recounted in Part II of my separate opinion creates a genuine issue of material fact that should be decided by trial.