Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Baldwin Supply Company

Nat’l Labor Rels. Bd. v. Baldwin Supply Co., 384 F.2d 999 (4th Cir. 1967)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1967-11-13
Topic: general

384 F.2d 999 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. BALDWIN SUPPLY COMPANY, Respondent. No. 11417. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued Nov. 8, 1967.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed National Labor Relations Board v. Baldwin Supply Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

384 F.2d 999

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
BALDWIN SUPPLY COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 11417.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 8, 1967.
Decided Nov. 13, 1967.

Abigail Cooley Baskir, Attorney, N.L.R.B., (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Michael N. Sohn, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner.

George V. Gardner, Washington, D.C. (Asa Ambrister, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and BRYAN, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM:

This case comes to us as a challenge to the Board's determination of an appropriate unit. With respect to this issue, we cannot find that the Board exceeded its discretion. Its order is therefore

Enforced.