Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Morse v. Boswell
401 F.2d 544
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1968-08-26
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM: For the reasons stated by the District Court, Morse v. Boswell, D.C., Md., 289 F.Supp. 812 (decided August 6, 1968), the judgment is affirmed. See also, Goldstein v. Clifford, D.C., N.J., 290 F.Supp. 275 (statutory three-judge court, decided August 21,1968). The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Morse v. Boswell. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 17 opinions
MORSE v. BOSWELL,401 F.2d 544(4th Cir. 1968)
SP 4 Bradish G. MORSE et al., Appellants, v. Colonel Charles B. BOSWELL,
Commanding Officer, Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, Honorable Clark
Clifford, Secretary of Defense, Honorable Stanley R. Resor, Secretary of
the Army, General Harold K. Johnson, Chief of Staff of the Army, and Lt.
General Jonathan O. Seaman, Commanding General, First United States Army,
Appellees.
No. 12738.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued August 26, 1968.
Decided August 26, 1968.
Certiorari Denied January 20, 1969.
See 89 S.Ct. 687.
Alan I. Baron, Asst U.S. Atty. Stephen H. Sachs, U.S. Atty, on brief), for appellees.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.
The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.
Affirmed.Page 545Page 574