Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Lorentzen v. Brazil Oiticica, Inc.

145 F.2d 470

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1944-11-20
Topic: bankruptcy

PER CURIAM. The judgment in this case is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the District Judge, 47 F.Supp. 969. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lorentzen v. Brazil Oiticica, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 13 opinions

LORENTZEN v. BRAZIL OITICICA,145 F.2d 470(4th Cir. 1944)

Oivind LORENTZEN, Director and Curator of Shipping of the Royal Norwegian

Government, Claimant of the BILL, Appellant, v. BRAZIL OITICICA, Inc.,

Appellee.

No. 5312.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

November 20, 1944.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; W. Calvin Chesnut, Judge.

Carver W. Wolfe, of New York City (Hatch Wolfe, of New York City, and Ritchie, Janney, Ober Williams and Robert W. Williams, all of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellant.

Henry N. Longley, of New York City (Bigham, Englar, Jones Houston, of New York City, and Lord Whip and George W.P. Whip, all of Baltimore, Md., and F. Herbert Prem, of New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges, and HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment in this case is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the District Judge,47 F. Supp. 969.

Affirmed.Page 471

Page 472