Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Haughton Elevator Co. v. Donata Corp.

381 F.2d 737

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1967-07-18
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: For reasons sufficiently appearing in the memorandum opinion of the District Court, 271 F.Supp. 958 the judgment, on these cross appeals, is affirmed. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Haughton Elevator Co. v. Donata Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

HAUGHTON ELEVATOR COMPANY v. DONATA CORP.,381 F.2d 737(4th Cir. 1967)

HAUGHTON ELEVATOR COMPANY, Appellee, v. DONATA CORPORATION, Appellant.

HAUGHTON ELEVATOR COMPANY, Appellant, v. DONATA CORPORATION, Appellee.

Nos. 11272, 11273.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 21, 1967.

Decided July 18, 1967.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria; Oren R. Lewis, Judge.

James R. Treese for Haughton Elevator Co.

George E. Cranwell, Washington, D.C., for Donata Corp.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

For reasons sufficiently appearing in the memorandum opinion of the District Court,271 F. Supp. 958the judgment, on these cross appeals, is affirmed.

Affirmed.Page 738

Page 792