Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Green v. County School Board of New Kent County

382 F.2d 338

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1967-06-12
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: The questions presented in this case are substantially the same as those we have considered and decided today in Bowman v. County School Bd. of Charles City County.1 For the reasons stated there, the rulings of the District Court merit our substantial approval, but the case is necessarily remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the District- Court’s order and our opinion in Bowman. Remanded. . 4 Cir. 382 F.2d 326 (Decided this day). The special concurring opinion of Judge Sobeloff, in whicb Judge Winter joins, in Bowman is applicable to this case also.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Green v. County School Board of New Kent County. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 4 opinions

GREEN v. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF NEW KENT CTY.,382 F.2d 338(4th Cir. 1967)

Charles C. GREEN, Carroll A. Green and Robert C. Green, infants, by Calvin

C. Green and Mary O. Green, their father and mother and next friends, and

all others of the plaintiffs, Appellants, v. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF NEW

KENT COUNTY, VIRGINIA et al., Appellees.

No. 10792.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued January 9, 1967.

Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari Granted December 11, 1967.

See 88 S.Ct. 565.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond; John D. Butzner, Jr., District Judge.

S.W. Tucker, Richmond, Va., (Henry L. Marsh, III, Willard H. Douglas, Jr., Richmond, Va., Jack Greenberg and James M. Nabrit, III, New York City, on brief) for appellants.

Frederick T. Gray, Richmond, Va., (Williams, Mullen Christian, Richmond, Va., on brief) for appellees.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF, BOREMAN, BRYAN, J. SPENCER BELL,^fn*WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges, sitting en banc.Page 339

PER CURIAM:

The questions presented in this case are substantially the same as those we have considered and decided today in Bowman v. County School Bd. of Charles City County.¹For the reasons stated there, the rulings of the District Court merit our substantial approval, but the case is necessarily remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the District Court's order and our opinion inBowman.

Remanded.Page 350

Judge Bell sat as a member of the Court when the case was heard but died before it was decided. ↩
4 Cir.382 F.2d 326(Decided this day). The special concurring opinion of Judge Sobeloff, in which Judge Winter joins, inBowmanis applicable to this case also. ↩