Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Falin v. Shalala

Falin v. Shalala, 6 F.3d 207 (4th Cir. 1993)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1993-09-30
Topic: general

OPINION PER CURIAM: We have considered. the record in this case, the briefs of the parties and oral argument and are of opinion that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed. Accordingly, we affirm on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court. Falin v. Sullivan, 776 F.Supp. 1097 (E.D.Va.1991). AFFIRMED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Falin v. Shalala. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 6 opinions

FALIN v. SHALALA,6 F.3d 207(4th Cir. 1993)

NORMA R. FALIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DONNA SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH

AND HUMAN SERVICES; LARRY JACKSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER

OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

No. 91-2386.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 5, 1992.

Decided September 30, 1993.

Martin Douglas Wegbreit, Client Centered Legal Services of Southwest Virginia, Inc., Castlewood, VA, argued, for appellant.

William Markley Reinhart, Asst. Regional Counsel, Office of the Gen. Counsel, Dept. of Health Human Services, Philadelphia, PA, argued (Eileen Bradley, Chief Counsel, Region III, Michael Leonard, Supervisory Asst. Regional Counsel, Office of the Gen. Counsel, Dept. of Health Human Services, Philadelphia, PA, Debra J. Prillaman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Richmond, VA, on brief), for Federal appellee.

Pamela M. Reed, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, argued (Mary Sue Terry, Atty. Gen. of Va., on brief), for State appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. at Richmond; James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-91-196-R).

Before WIDENER, Circuit Judge, SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge, and KAUFMAN, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.

[1]OPINION

PER CURIAM:

[2] We have considered the record in this case, the briefs of the parties and oral argument and are of opinion that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed.

[3] Accordingly, we affirm on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court.Falin v. Sullivan,776 F. Supp. 1097(E.D.Va. 1991).

[4]AFFIRMED.Page 208