Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Donzel Lemley v. United States

Donzel Lemley v. United States, 455 F.2d 522 (4th Cir. 1971)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1971-10-19
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: We have carefully considered the briefs and the record and conclude that oral argument is unnecessary. We affirm on the opinion of the district court. Lemley v. United States, 317 F.Supp. 350 (1970). Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Donzel Lemley v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 4 opinions

LEMLEY v. UNITED STATES,455 F.2d 522(4th Cir. 1971)

DONZEL LEMLEY, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE.

No. 15193.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

October 19, 1971.

Michael Tomasky and Mike Magro, Jr., Morgantown, W. Va., on brief for appellant.

L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Department of Justice, James P. Klapps, Atty., Department of Justice, and Paul C. Camilletti, U.S. Atty., on brief, for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Fairmont; Sidney L. Christie, Judge.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, CRAVEN, Circuit Judge, and DUPREE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

[1] We have carefully considered the briefs and the record and conclude that oral argument is unnecessary. We affirm on the opinion of the district court. Lemley v. United States,317 F. Supp. 350(1970).

[2] Affirmed.Page 644