Albert Russell v. C.C. Sheffer, Superintendent Botetourt Correctional Unit, and Carolyn Maupia, L.P.N., Botetourt Correctional Unit

holding that “questions of medical judgment are not subject to judicial review” under § 1983 | holding that “[q]uestions of medical judgment are not subject to judicial review” | holding that “mistreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as “cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim under § 1983” and that “[q]uestions of medical judgment are not subject to judicial review’ | noting an inmate’s allegations of unreasonable medical care “must reach constitutional dimension before a federal court will interfere with the internal operations” of a penal facility and that “[q]uestions of medical judgment are not subject to judicial review” | “[M]istreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim” | “[M]istreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim[.]” | “[M]istreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim[.]” | “[M]istreatment or non- treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim . . . .” | “[M]istreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as cruel and unusual punishment in order to present a colorable claim….” | “[M]istreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim . . . . ” | “[M]istreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim . . . . ” | “[M]istreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim . . . . ” | “[M]istreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim” | “[M]istreatment or non- treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim” | “[Ml]istreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim... .”’ | “[M]istreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim” | “[M]istreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as cruel and unusual punishment in order to present a colorable claim” | “[M]istreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim” | plaintiff was under “constant medical supervision from the time of his arrival” in state prison and “[q]uestions of medical judgment are not subject to judicial review” | plaintiff was under “constant medical supervision from the time of his arrival” in state prison and “[q]uestions of medical judgment are not subject to judicial review” | mere disagreements between an inmate and medical staff regarding medical treatment do not state a claim, as questions of medial judgment are not subject to judicial review | plaintiff was under constant medical supervision from the time of his arrival” in state prison and that “[q]uestions of medical judgment are not subject to judicial review” | “[M]istreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim[.]” (citing Gittlemacker v. Prasse, 428 F.2d 1, 6 (3rd Cir. 1970)) | “[M]istreatment or non-treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a colorable claim under §1983.” (citing Gittlemacker v. Prasse, 428 F.2d 1, 6 (3d Cir. 1970)) | “[M]istreatment or non- treatment must be capable of characterization as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in order to present a