Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

William Grant Temple v. Robert Pergament

William Grant Temple v. Robert Pergament, 343 F.2d 474 (3d Cir. 1965)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1965-04-15
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: The judgment of the district court dismissing this action as failing to state a federal cause of action against the defendant Pergament was legally correct and will be affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed William Grant Temple v. Robert Pergament. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

TEMPLE v. PERGAMENT,343 F.2d 474(3rd Cir. 1965)

William Grant TEMPLE, Appellant, v. Robert PERGAMENT.

No. 15166.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted March 29, 1965.

Decided April 15, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Mitchell H. Cohen, Judge.

William Grant Temple, Pro se.

Murray Fredericks, City Sol., Atlantic City, N.J. (Chaim H. Sandler, Associate City Sol., Atlantic City, N.J., on the brief), for appellee.

Before HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges, and WEBER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court dismissing this action as failing to state a federal cause of action against the defendant Pergament was legally correct and will be affirmed.Page 475