Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
United States v. William L. Kann, William L. Kann, Jr., Elise K. Goldman, Betty K. Wilson and Robert M. Kann, Additional
333 F.2d 146
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1964-04-10
- Topic
- bankruptcy
PER CURIAM. This appeal presents the same issues as those decided today in United States v. Sullivan, 333 F.2d 100, and United States v. Wilson, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, Appellant, 333 F.2d 137, i. e., issues relating to automatic premium loans and policy loans. We resolve these issues here as we did in the eases just cited.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. William L. Kann, William L. Kann, Jr., Elise K. Goldman, Betty K. Wilson and Robert M. Kann, Additional. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
UNITED STATES v. KANN,333 F.2d 146(3rd Cir. 1964)
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. William L. KANN et al., William L.
Kann, Jr., Elise K. Goldman, Betty K. Wilson and Robert M. Kann,
Additional Defendants.
No. 14092.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued April 5, 1963.
Submitted October 12, 1963.
Decided April 10, 1964.
Alexander Black, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Buchanan, Ingersoll, Rodewald, Kyle Buerger, Pittsburgh, Pa., Vincent V.R. Booth, Boston, Mass., Edwin M. Jones, Edmund R. Harnedy, New York City, T.G. Thornbury, Fort Wayne, Ind., on the brief), for appellees New England Mut. Life Ins. Co., New York Life Ins. Co. and Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co.
Thomas Lewis Jones, White, Jones Gregg, formerly White Jones, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Richard C. Witt, Pittsburgh, Pa., Eugene T. O'Neill, Stuart A. McCarthy, Marshall F. Denenholz, Robert A. Kagan, New York City, on the brief), for appellee Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United States.
Gilbert J. Helwig, Pittsburgh, Pa. (J. Tomlinson Fort, Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., Harry Fisher, Newark, N.J., E.H. McVitty, Toronto, Canada, Gerald M. Swanstrom, Milwaukee, Wis., on the brief), for appellees Manufacturers Life Ins. Co., Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co. and Prudential Ins. Co. of America.
K. Martin Worthy, Glenn L. Archer, Jr., Hamel, Morgan, Park Saunders, Washington, D.C., for Life Insurance Ass'n of America, amicus curiae.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER, STALEY, HASTIE, GANEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
It is unnecessary to set out the facts of the instant appeal for they appear sufficiently in the opinion of the court below, reported at203 F. Supp. 1(1962), and in the "Tabulation of Information re Life Insurance Policies" which is appended to the Sullivan opinion and which is incorporated in this opinion by reference. It must be borne in mind that those portions of the "Tabulation" which are enclosed by parentheses cannot be found in the records of the respective cases. As with United States v. Sullivan, supra, however, sufficient facts appear of record in the instant case to make possible a final disposition of the present controversy.
For the reasons set forth in the Sullivan and Massachusetts Mutual opinions, the judgment is correct and consequently will be affirmed.
HASTIE, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in United States v. Sullivan, 333 F.2d 121.