Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
United States v. Rutledge Slattery
333 F.2d 844
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1964-06-23
- Topic
- general
333 F.2d 844 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Rutledge SLATTERY. No. 14807. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued May 21, 1964.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Rutledge Slattery. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Rutledge SLATTERY.
No. 14807.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued May 21, 1964.
Decided June 23, 1964.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Francis L. Van Dusen, Judge.
Jonathan S. Cohen, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, David O. Walter, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Drew J. T. O'Keefe, U. S. Atty., Sullivan Cistone, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellant.
Rutledge Slattery, Philadelphia, Pa., pro se.
Before KALODNER, GANEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we find no error. The District Court's Order for Entry of Judgment will be affirmed, 224 F.Supp. 214.