Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

United States v. Oscar Sipler, Monema Sipler

191 F.2d 816

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1951-10-23
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The sole question here involved is whether there was abuse of discretion by the Court below in refusing to reopen the judgment in this case. We have gone over the record and find no such abuse. The judgment appealed from will be affirmed. 94 F.Supp. 987.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Oscar Sipler, Monema Sipler. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 3 opinions

UNITED STATES v. SIPLER,191 F.2d 816(3rd Cir. 1951)

UNITED STATES of America v. Oscar SIPLER, Monema Sipler, Appellants.

No. 10445.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued October 5, 1951.

Decided October 23, 1951.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; Albert L. Watson, Judge.

Louis G. Feldmann, Wilkes-Barre, Pa. (M.S. DePierro, Harry P. O'Neil, Jr., Wilkes-Barre, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

Arthur A. Maguire, Scranton, Pa. (Joseph P. Brennan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Scranton, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The sole question here involved is whether there was abuse of discretion by the Court below in refusing to reopen the judgment in this case. We have gone over the record and find no such abuse. The judgment appealed from will be affirmed.94 F. Supp. 987.