Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

United States v. Kemmel

United States v. Kemmel, 295 F.2d 712 (3d Cir. 1961)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1961-11-03
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. We have carefully examined the record and have considered the arguments of appellant’s counsel. We can find no substantial prejudicial error in the proceeding. Consequently the judgment of conviction will be affirmed, D.C., 188 F.Supp. 736.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Kemmel. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
2 opinions
UNITED STATES v. KEMMEL,295 F.2d 712(3rd Cir. 1961)
UNITED STATES of America, v. John B. KEMMEL, Appellant.
No. 13543.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued July 24, 1961.
Decided November 3, 1961.
Rehearing Denied December 5, 1961.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; John W. Murphy, Judge.
Stanford Shmukler, Philadelphia, Pa. (Jacob Kossman, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Oliver Dibble, Washington, D.C. (Herbert J. Miller, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Daniel Jenkins, U.S. Atty., Middle Dist. of Pennsylvania, Scranton, Pa., on the brief), for United States.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and GOODRICH and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully examined the record and have considered the arguments of appellant's counsel. We can find no substantial prejudicial error in the proceeding. Consequently the judgment of conviction will be affirmed, D.C.,188 F. Supp. 736.Page 713