Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Nos. 89-5391, 90-5686
Nos. 89-5391, 90-5686, 941 F.2d 1200 (3d Cir. 1991)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1991-07-23
- Topic
- general
941 F.2d 1200 Demenus (Manfred), Van Arthos (Theodore) v. Tinton 35, Inc., Tinton 60, Inc., Homes for Today, Inc., Marcus (Harvey I.), Jacques Rotnemer Group Construction Company of Ocean Township, Inc., Sylvester (Herbert), Speyer (Colette), Spyco, Inc. NOS. 89-5391, 90-5686 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. JUL 23, 1991 1 Appeal From: D.N.J. 2 AFFIRMED. Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Nos. 89-5391, 90-5686. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Demenus (Manfred), Van Arthos (Theodore)
v.
Tinton 35, Inc., Tinton 60, Inc., Homes for Today, Inc.,
Marcus (Harvey I.), Jacques Rotnemer Group
Construction Company of Ocean Township,
Inc., Sylvester (Herbert),
Speyer (Colette), Spyco, Inc.
NOS. 89-5391, 90-5686
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
JUL 23, 1991
Appeal From: D.N.J.
AFFIRMED.
Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)