Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Johnson v. Zarefoss

305 F.2d 825

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1962-08-03
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. We will affirm the judgment of the court below, 198 F.Supp. 548, granting the motion by the defendants-appellees to dismiss the complaint. We do so because the plaintiffs-appellants’ contentions are totally devoid of merit. The result we have reached renders it unnecessary for us to examine or discuss breaches of the Rules of Civil Procedure by the plaintiffs-appellants.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Johnson v. Zarefoss. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

JOHNSON v. ZAREFOSS,305 F.2d 825(3rd Cir. 1962)

Larry JOHNSON, a Minor, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Jess Johnson,

and Jess Johnson, in His Own Right, Appellants, v. Doctor Albert ZAREFOSS,

Nettie Zarefoss, a/k/a Mrs. A.H. Zarefoss and Larry Zarefoss.

No. 13818.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued June 21, 1962.

Decided August 3, 1962.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; John W. Lord, Judge.

Ronald Ziegler, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Harry A. Short, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (John J. McDevitt, 3rd, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and GANEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We will affirm the judgment of the court below,198 F. Supp. 548, granting the motion by the defendants-appellees to dismiss the complaint. We do so because the plaintiffs-appellants' contentions are totally devoid of merit. The result we have reached renders it unnecessary for us to examine or discuss breaches of the Rules of Civil Procedure by the plaintiffs-appellants.