Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Harshman v. Well Service, Inc.

355 F.2d 206

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1965-12-17
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in the opinion of Judge Marsh, 248 F.Supp. 953.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Harshman v. Well Service, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

HARSHMAN v. WELL SERVICE, INCORPORATED,355 F.2d 206(3rd Cir. 1965)

Paul C. HARSHMAN, Appellant in No. 15352, Glenn R. Jacobs, Appellant in

No. 15353, Beryl D. Ward, Appellant in No. 15354, v. WELL SERVICE,

INCORPORATED.

Nos. 15352-15354.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued December 6, 1965.

Decided December 17, 1965.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Rabe Ferguson Marsh, Jr., Judge.

Charles R. Volk, Pittsburgh, Pa., James Hook, Waynesburg, Pa. (Thorp, Reed Armstrong, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

Paul N. Bowles, Charleston, W. Va. (Stone, Mauzy, Bowles Kauffelt, Charleston, W. Va., Fred C. Houston, Jr., Houston, Houston Donnelly, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, Chief Judge, and MARIS and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in the opinion of Judge Marsh,248 F. Supp. 953.Page 207