Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

General Electric Co. v. Kirkpatrick

312 F.2d 742

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1962-12-31
Topic
general

BIGGS, Chief Judge, notes his dissent from the order, insofar as it denies a rule to show cause why the writs of prohibition and mandamus should not issue.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed General Electric Co. v. Kirkpatrick. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
27 opinions
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY v. KIRKPATRICK,312 F.2d 742(3rd Cir. 1962)
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and Henry W. Sawyer, 3d, Petitioners v. Honorable
William H. KIRKPATRICK, Senior Judge of the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
No. 14218.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Submitted November 7, 1962.
Decided December 31, 1962.
Rehearing Denied January 16, 1963.
Certiorari Denied March 18, 1963.
See 83 S.Ct. 937.
On Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition.
Henry W. Sawyer, III, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioners.

Harold E. Kohn, and Aaron M. Fine, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondents.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.
Upon consideration of the petition by General Electric Company and Henry W. Sawyer, III, Esquire, filed in this Court November 7, 1962.Page 743

It is Ordered that the prayer of the petition that writs of prohibition and mandamus be issued to the respondent, the Honorable William H. Kirkpatrick, with respect to his order of October 19, 1962 in District Court Civil Actions Nos. 29810, 29920, 29928, 29930, 29931, 29817, 29925, 29926, 29927, 29929, 30015, 30017, 30018, 30020, 30021 and 30023 be and it hereby is denied.

BIGGS, Chief Judge, notes his dissent from the order, insofar as it denies a rule to show cause why the writs of prohibition and mandamus should not issue.Page 748