Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Estate of Fuller v. Commissioner

171 F.2d 704

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1948-12-13
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed upon its opinion as reported in 9 T.C. 1069.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Estate of Fuller v. Commissioner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

FULLER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,171 F.2d 704(3rd Cir. 1948)

ESTATE of Mortimer B. FULLER, Deceased, Kathryn S. Fuller, Edward L.

Fuller, Mortimer B. Fuller, Jr., and Henry S. Fuller, Executors,

Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 9669.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued October 21, 1948.

Decided December 13, 1948.

Petition for Review of Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

Warren W. Grimes, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

S. Dee Hanson, Washington, D.C. (Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., and George A. Stinson and A.F. Prescott, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and GOODRICH and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed upon its opinion as reported in9 T.C. 1069.Page 705