Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Derzack v. County of Allegheny Children and Youth Services

118 F.3d 1575

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1997-06-20
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • “[Prejudice] can consist of the extra costs of repeated delays in filing of motions necessitated by the improper behavior on the part of plaintiffs.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Derzack v. County of Allegheny Children and Youth Services. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
8 opinions

118 F.3d 1575

Michael Derzack, Karen Derzack
v.
County of Allegheny Children and Youth Services, Mary E.
Freeland, Director, County of Allegheny Children and Youth
Services, a/k/a Mary E. Garland, Marcia Studivant-Anderson,
Regional Director, County of Allegheny Children and Youth
Services, Tracey Vorpagel, Caseworker for County of
Allegheny Children and Youth Services, Daniel Krikston,
Deputy Director, County of Allegheny Children and Youth Services,

NO. 96-3761

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

June 20, 1997

1

Appeal From: W.D.Pa. ,No.94cv00943 ,

2

Lee, J,

173 F.R.D. 400

3

Affirmed.