Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Bromley v. McCaughn

36 F.2d 1019

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1929-12-21
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Affirmed, on answers made by the Supreme Court of the United States to questions certified under section 239 of the Judicial Code (28 USCA § 346). 280 U. S. 124, 50 S. Ct. 46, 74 L. Ed.-.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bromley v. McCaughn. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

BROMLEY v. McCAUGHN,36 F.2d 1019(3rd Cir. 1929)

Joseph H. BROMLEY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Blakely D. McCAUGHN, Collector

of Internal Revenue, Defendant in Error.

No. 3927.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

December 21, 1929.

In error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Oliver B. Dickinson, Judge.

Affirming judgment26 F.2d 380.

Ira J. Williams, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Brown Williams, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Chas. T. Hendler, of Washington, D.C., for defendant in error.

Before BUFFINGTON and WOOLLEY, Circuit Judges, and McVICAR, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, on answers made by the Supreme Court of the United States to questions certified under section 239 of the Judicial Code (28 USCA § 346).280 U.S. 124, 50 S. Ct. 46, 74 L. Ed. ___.