Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Brent Colbert, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Dymacol, Inc. Intellirisk Management Corp.

305 F.3d 1256

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 2002-10-03
Topic: litigation

ORDER A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above appeal, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court vacate the opinion and judgment filed August 28, 2002 and list the above for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the Court.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Brent Colbert, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Dymacol, Inc. Intellirisk Management Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

COLBERT v. DYMACOL, INC.,305 F.3d 1256(3rd Cir. 2002)

Brent COLBERT, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v.

DYMACOL, INC.; Intellirisk Management Corp., Appellants.

No. 01-4397.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

October 3, 2002.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, D.C. No.: 01-cv-03577, District Judge: Honorable Clarence C. Newcomer.

Before ROTH, RENDELL, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above appeal, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court vacate the opinion and judgment filed August 28, 2002 and list the above for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the Court.Page 237