Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Barringer v. Prudential Insurance

153 F.2d 224

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1946-02-01
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the court below is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Kirkpatrick, 62 F.Supp. 286.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Barringer v. Prudential Insurance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

BARRINGER v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO. OF AM.,153 F.2d 224(3rd Cir. 1946)

Helen M. BARRINGER, Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA.

No. 8978.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued January 22, 1946.

Decided February 1, 1946.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; William H. Kirkpatrick, Judge.

Abraham L. Freedman, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Wolf, Block, Schorr Solis-Cohen, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Joseph W. Henderson, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Kendall H. Shoyer, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, MARIS, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Kirkpatrick,62 F. Supp. 286.