Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Arthur W. Gibson v. United States of America, United States Maritime Commission

200 F.2d 336

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1952-12-22
Topic: general

PER CÚRIAM. A careful examination of the briefs and the record in this appeal and consideration of the oral arguments of counsel have convinced us that the court below committed np 'error in its decision. We can add nothing to the careful analyses contained in the findings of fact, in the conclusions of law, and in the opinion of Judge Kalodner. See 100 F.Supp. 954. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Arthur W. Gibson v. United States of America, United States Maritime Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

W. GIBSON v. UNITED STATES,200 F.2d 336(3rd Cir. 1952)

Arthur W. GIBSON v. UNITED STATES of America, United States Maritime

Commission, Appellant.

No. 10758.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued December 2, 1952.

Decided December 22, 1952.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Harry E. Kalodner, Judge.

Thomas E. Byrne, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Gerald A. Gleeson, U.S. Atty., Springer H. Moore, Jr., Rowland C. Evans, Jr., Krusen, Evans Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Abraham E. Freedman, Philadelphia, Pa. (Charles Lakatos, William M. Alper and Freedman, Landy Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

A careful examination of the briefs and the record in this appeal and consideration of the oral arguments of counsel have convinced us that the court below committed no error in its decision. We can add nothing to the careful analyses contained in the findings of fact, in the conclusions of law, and in the opinion of Judge Kalodner. See100 F. Supp. 954. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.