Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

American Dredging Company v. Calmar Steamship Corporation, Cross-Libellant

218 F.2d 823

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1955-01-31
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. In this maritime collision case, the district court in a carefully considered decision found the appellant solely to blame. Our own examination of the record satisfies us that this finding is supported by substantial evidence. The decree of the district court, 121 F.Supp. 255, will be affirmed. McAllister v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed American Dredging Company v. Calmar Steamship Corporation, Cross-Libellant. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
9 opinions
AMERICAN DREDGING COMPANY v. CALMAR S.S. CORP.,218 F.2d 823(3rd Cir. 1955)
AMERICAN DREDGING COMPANY, Appellant, v. CALMAR STEAMSHIP CORPORATION,
Cross-Libellant,
No. 11445.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued January 19, 1955.
Decided January 31, 1955.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Thomas J. Clary, Judge.
Samuel B. Fortenbaugh, Jr., Philadelphia (Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh, Young, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Leslie C. Krusen, Philadelphia, Pa., (Krusen, Evans Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In this maritime collision case, the district court in a carefully considered decision found the appellant solely to blame. Our own examination of the record satisfies us that this finding is supported by substantial evidence. The decree of the district court,121 F. Supp. 255, will be affirmed. McAllister v. United States,348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6.Page 824Page 68