Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.
113 F.2d 114
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1940-07-08
- Topic
- international-arbitration
113 F.2d 114 (1940) WESTMORELAND ASBESTOS COMPANY, Inc., Home Insulation Company, Inc., Westchester Asbestos Corporation, Rock Wool Insulation Corporation, Plaintiffs, W. G. Kuehn, Inc., and William G. Kuehn, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, John A.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
WESTMORELAND ASBESTOS COMPANY, Inc., Home Insulation Company, Inc., Westchester Asbestos Corporation, Rock Wool Insulation Corporation, Plaintiffs, W. G. Kuehn, Inc., and William G. Kuehn, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, John A. Roebling's Sons Company of New York, Stellar Corporation, and Hiram E. Manville, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 391.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
July 8, 1940.Weissberger & Leichter, of New York City (M. M. Leichter and John L. Ketcham, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.
Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner & Reed, of New York City (Theodore Kiendl, A. S. Edmonds, and Francis W. Phillips, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.
Before SWAN, CLARK and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on opinion below, 30 F.Supp. 389, in which decision was adhered to on reargument in 32 F.Supp. 731, without appellate costs.