Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Co. v. John J. Reynolds, Inc.

Warner-Lambert Pharm. Co. v. John J. Reynolds, Inc., 280 F.2d 197 (2d Cir. 1960)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1960-06-21
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The grant of summary judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Bryan, reported at D.C.S.D.N.Y.1959, 178 F.*198Supp. 655. The appeal from Judge Bryan’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for leave to deposit in court royalty payments accruing during the pendency of the suit is dismissed as moot.

Citator

Cited by
3 opinions
WARNER-LAMBERT PHARM. CO. v. JOHN J. REYNOLDS,280 F.2d 197(2nd Cir. 1960)
WARNER-LAMBERT PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN
J. REYNOLDS, INC., American Bible Society, Susan Hopkins Whitmore,
Josephine Hopkins Graeber, Minnie Hopkins Gilbert, individually and as
Trustee, and John Graeber, as Trustee, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 133, 340, Dockets 25866, 26115.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued June 7, 1960.
Decided June 21, 1960.
Paul D. Miller, New York City (Milton Black, Leonard Garment, Ronald O. Thomas, Clifton Cooper, and Mudge, Stern, Baldwin Todd, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

John P. McGrath, New York City (Martin D. Jacobs and Hodges, Reavis, McGrath Downey, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee John J. Reynolds, Inc.

William E. Vogel, New York City (Burke Burke, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee American Bible Soc.

William Eldred Jackson, New York City (Harrison Tweed, Rebecca M. Cutler and Milbank, Tweed, Hope Hadley, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellees Susan Hopkins Whitmore, Josephine Hopkins Graeber, Minnie Hopkins Gilbert and John Graeber.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and CLARK and MOORE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The grant of summary judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Bryan, reported at D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1959,Page 198178 F. Supp. 655. The appeal from Judge Bryan's denial of plaintiff's motion for leave to deposit in court royalty payments accruing during the pendency of the suit is dismissed as moot.