Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Munchak

United States v. Munchak, 460 F.2d 1407 (2d Cir. 1972)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1972-06-15
Topic
litigation

PER CURIAM: The order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial is affirmed on the basis of Judge Weinfeld’s opinion below. 338 F.Supp. 1283 (S.D.N.Y.1972).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Munchak. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
2 opinions
UNITED STATES v. MUNCHAK,460 F.2d 1407(2nd Cir. 1972)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. ANDREW MUNCHAK, JR., APPELLANT.
No. 825, Docket 72-1388.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued June 13, 1972.
Decided June 15, 1972.
Edward N. Costikyan, New York City (Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton Garrison, Jack C. Auspitz, Warren M. Green, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel J. Sullivan, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U.S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, John W. Nields, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Appeal from an order of Judge Weinfeld in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denying appellant's motion for a new trial under F.R.Crim.P. 33 on the grounds of newly discovered evidence.
Before KAUFMAN, HAYS and OAKES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[1] The order denying appellant's motion for a new trial is affirmed on the basis of Judge Weinfeld's opinion below. 338 F.Supp. 1283 (S.D.N.Y. 1972).Page 68