Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Mauro

United States v. Mauro, 399 F.2d 158 (2d Cir. 1968)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1968-09-05
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM: We affirm in open court the judgment of the district court which denied Mauro’s motion to vacate, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the judgment of his conviction for violation of the narcotics laws, substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Croake’s opinion reported, sub nom. United States v. Caruso et al., D.C., 280 F.Supp. 371 (1967).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Mauro. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 13 opinions

UNITED STATES v. MAURO,399 F.2d 158(2nd Cir. 1968)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Vincent MAURO, Appellant.

No. 10, Docket 32255.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued September 5, 1968.

Decided September 5, 1968.

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thomas F. Croake, J., denying petitioner's motion, pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 2255, to vacate the judgment of his conviction for violation of the narcotics laws.

Irving Anolik, New York City (Michael P. Direnzo, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Arthur A. Munisteri, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, Leonard M. Marks, Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and ANDERSON and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm in open court the judgment of the district court which denied Mauro's motion to vacate, pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 2255, the judgment of his conviction for violation of the narcotics laws, substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Croake's opinion reported, sub nom. United States v. Caruso et al., D.C.,280 F. Supp. 371(1967).