Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Caiola

222 F.2d 369

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1955-03-17
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Appeal dismissed in open court for want of jurisdiction. 17 F.R.D. 326.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Caiola. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 5 opinions

UNITED STATES v. CAIOLA,222 F.2d 369(2nd Cir. 1955)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stefano Peter CAIOLA and

Stefano Tortelli Manzo, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 151, Docket 23321.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued March 17, 1955.

Decided March 17, 1955.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York; Stephen W. Brennan, Judge.

Anthony S. Falcone, Utica, N.Y., for defendants-appellants.

Theodore F. Bowes, U.S. Atty., for Northern Dist. of N.Y., Syracuse, N.Y. (Richard E. Bolton, Asst. U.S. Atty., Troy, N.Y., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, FRANK, Circuit Judge, and GALSTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed in open court for want of jurisdiction. 17 F.R.D. 326.