Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Wyer

United R.R. Operating Crafts v. Wyer, 205 F.2d 153 (2d Cir. 1953)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1953-06-23
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The orders are affirmed on the opinion of the District Court in United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Wyer, Trustee, 111 F. Supp. -.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Wyer. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 4 opinions

UNITED RAILROAD OPERATING CRAFTS v. WYER,205 F.2d 153(2nd Cir. 1953)

UNITED RAILROAD OPERATING CRAFTS, A Railroad Labor Organization National

in Scope, and John J. Gallagher, Jr., Howard T. Hunt, Clifford W. Carlson

and Robert T. Owens, individually and on behalf of all members of the

plaintiff Railway Organization as a class who are too numerous to be made

parties plaintiffs, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. William WYER, as Trustee of

The Long Island Railroad Company, a corporation, Brotherhood of Locomotive

Firemen and Enginemen and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers,

Defendants-Appellees, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen,

Intervenor-Appellee. UNITED RAILROAD OPERATING CRAFTS, a Railroad Labor

Organization, National in Scope, and Robert M. Harkinson and Arthur T.

Beswick, Individually and on behalf of all members of the Plaintiff

Railway Organization as a class who are too numerous to be made parties

plaintiffs, and Wilton A. Ryder, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NEW YORK, NEW

HAVEN HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee,

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Intervenor-Appellee.

Nos. 285, 286, Docket 22740-22741.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued June 4, 1953.

Decided June 23, 1953.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Edward A. Conger, Judge.

From an order vacating temporary restraining orders, denying a preliminary injunction, and dismissing a complaint against William Wyer, Trustee, et al., for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, and from a similar order in an action against The New York, New Haven Hartford Railroad Company, et al., the plaintiffs have taken companion appeals.

Maurice R. Whitebook, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants United Railroad Operating Crafts et al.

Richard R. Bongartz, New York City, William F. McNulty and William J. O'Brien, New York City, of counsel, for defendant-appellee, William Wyer, as trustee of Long Island R. Co.

Polier Midonick, — Shad Polier, Millard L. Midonick and David Bromberg, New York City, Clifford D. O'Brien and Ruth Weyand, Chicago, Ill., and Harold C. Heiss, and Russell B. Day, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for defendants-appellees Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen and for Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers.

Bernard L. Alderman, New York City, for intervenor-appellee, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen.

Edward R. Brumley, New York City, for defendant-appellee, New York, N.H. H.R. Co.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The orders are affirmed on the opinion of the District Court in United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Wyer, Trustee, 115 F. Supp. ___.